Legal Opinion
Battles Farm Co. v. Harris
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 1, 1983No. Nos. 76-1641, 76-1642PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
Battles Farm Co., and three other owners of low-income housing projects, challenge the failure of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (Secretary) to implement an “operating subsidy” plan for low-income housing projects pursuant to § 236 of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1715z-l (1976).1 Under the operating subsidy program payments were made to owners of low-income housing for increases in local property taxes and utilities. These payments operated to insulate low-income tenants from paying rents in excess of thirty percent of their incomes as a result of…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Hilda Abrams v. Carla A. Hills, as Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Underwood v. HillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
- Dew v. McLendon Gardens AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975
- Ross v. Community Services, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Dubose v. HillsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Battles Farm Co. v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Battles Farm Company v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Battles Farm Company v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Battles Farm Company v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, (Two Cases). Battles Farm Company v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986