Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Ins. Company v. Tuscaloosa Parking Auth.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 22, 2002No. 1001329PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a declaratory-judgment action involving the interpretation of an insurance policy. The defendant, Cincinnati Insurance Company (hereinafter "Cincinnati"), appeals from a summary judgment entered for the plaintiff, Tuscaloosa County Parking and Transit Authority (hereinafter "the Authority"). We affirm.

The Authority is a public organization created by the Legislature to receive federal funding for operating a public transportation agency in Tuscaloosa. The Authority is governed by a board of directors (hereinafter "the Board"), the members of which serve on a volunteer basis. From 1994…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. Turner v. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Mortell v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Altiere v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Dickson v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Performance Autoplex II Ltd. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. R & J ENTERPRIZES v. General Cas. Co. of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. ABC Imaging of Washington, Inc. v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICACourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Renasant Bank v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2017
  5. 3BC Properties, LLC v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API