Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 26, 1991No. 90-5942PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as the successor in interest to Farmers Bank and Trust (“FBT”), a failed federal savings bank, filed this lawsuit against St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, asserting four claims under a bankers blanket bond issued to FBT by St. Paul. After a bench trial, the district court, in an extensive and thorough opinion, made findings of fact and conclusions of law. FDIC v. St. Paul Fire and Ma rine Ins. Co., 738 F.Supp. 1146 (M.D.Tenn. 1990).
The FDIC asserts its claim under a “dishonesty clause” and a “forgery clause”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Morelock v. NCR Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- John M. Brown v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Rosa Parks v. Laface RecordsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Performance Autoplex II Ltd. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Gomez-Candelaria v. Rivera-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Rafic Saadeh v. Fawaz FaroukiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United Pacific Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.