Legal Opinion

Mangianfico v. Stanton

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 20, 2019No. 1:19-cv-10490Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS FRANCO MANGIANFICO, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * C.A. No. 19-10490-ADB * JOSEPH STANTON, Appeals Clerk, * * Defendant. * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BURROUGHS, D.J. For the reasons set forth below, the Court (1) grants the plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) denies the plaintiff’s emergency motion; and (3) directs the plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. I. BACKGROUND On March 14, 2019, pro se plaintiff Franco Mangianfico of Lynn, Massachusetts, filed a complaint naming as defendant the Clerk…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API