Dorris v. Sullivan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
— Action to recover damages for the diversion of water, by the defendant, from plaintiff's water ditch, and to perpetually enjoin the defendant from diverting water from said ditch in the future.
•Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.
Plaintiff's ditch was completely constructed in 1887, and ran through the west half of the northeast quarter and east half of the northwest quarter of section 7, township 42 north, of range 13 east, Mount Diablo meridian, owned by F. S. Chapman. Before the construction of the ditch,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kentfield v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- De Arguello v. BoursCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Quinn v. KenneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Frixen v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Empire Investment Co. v. MortCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Murphy v. KerrDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1923
- Mudge v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.