Legal Opinion

Mammenga v. State Department of Human Services

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 21, 1989No. C1-88-512Published

1Opinion of the Court

442 N.W.2d 786 (1989)

Mary MAMMENGA, Respondent,

v.

STATE of Minnesota DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Petitioners, Appellants.

No. C1-88-512.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 21, 1989.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., John L. Kirwin, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and D. Gerald Wilhelm, Martin County Atty., Fairmont, for petitioners, appellants.

Charles H. Thomas, Southern Minnesota Regional Legal Services, Inc., Mankato, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

SIMONETT, Justice.

We conclude that the agency rule by which respondent was denied general assistance (GA)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Contos v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Mammenga v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. City of St. Paul v. DalsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API