State v. Miller

The defendant upon appeal does not argue that the evidence was insufficient to convict him but does contend that the trial court did commit prejudicial errors. His allegations of error are summarized in the following issues:(1) At the hearing on the voluntariness of admissions, did the trial court err in limiting the testimony of the police officers to the facts and circumstances under which the defendant’s admissions were given?(2) Does Miranda render inadmissible in evidence the oral admissions made by the defendant to the police officers ?(3) Did the trial court err in denying the…