City of Kalamazoo v. Michigan Disposal Service Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCOVILLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Introduction
Presently before the court is a motion by defendant Brunswick Corporation to disqualify plaintiffs counsel, Dykema Gos-sett. The asserted ground for disqualification is Dykema Gossett’s involvement in litigation previously pending before this court, to which Brunswick was a party, a case which Brunswick asserts is substantially related to the present case. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds that Dykema Gossett, as “common coun sel” for the Joint Defense Group in the previous litigation, had a direct attorney-client…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- CenTra, Inc. v. EstrinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- El Camino Resources, Ltd. v. Huntington National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
- Elonex I.P. Holdings, Ltd. v. Apple Computer, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2001
- Eagle v. Hurley Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- Roosevelt Irrigation District v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.