Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Gillman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 19, 1978No. 78-430PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs below, seek reversal of an adverse judgment, entered following a non-jury trial. Thereby, plaintiffs’ claim for specific performance of a real estate sales contract was denied. We hold no reversible error has been shown, and affirm.

On November 8, 1968, the plaintiffs Nathan Siegel and Melvin Fisher (as purchasers) entered into a written contract with Dorothy Rose Gillman (as seller) joined by her husband, Isidor Gillman, for the sale of certain described improved real property. The contract, which did not state that time should be of the essence, fixed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Asia v. HiserSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  2. Hatchcock v. Societe Anonyme La FloridienneSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Greenfield v. BlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. Perry v. BensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blaustein v. WeissDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API