Legal Opinion

Hatchcock v. Societe Anonyme La Floridienne

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1907PublishedCited by 8 opinions

This case was decided by Division A. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCockrell, J.

— Hathcock on May 24. 1907, filed his bill for specific performance of an alleged contract of sale of phosphate lands formerly owned by Tower & Shaw, a partnership, and subsequently sold to the Societe Anonyme through Edward Holder, all of whom were made parties defendant. Decrees pro confesso were entered against Tower & Shaw, but the separate demurrers of the Societe Anonyme and of Flolder were sustained arid the bill of complaint dismissed as to them. From this decree the complainant appeals, naming all the defendants in the appeal.

The grounds of demurrer were want of equity and *632laches,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cilabot v. Winter Park Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1894
  2. Tate v. Pensacola, Gulf, Land & Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1896
  3. Knox v. SprattSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  4. Asia v. HiserSupreme Court of Florida · 1896

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dehuy v. OsborneSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Nobles v. L'EngleSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  3. Coral Gables, Inc. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Shirley v. Lake Butler CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  5. Greenfield v. BlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API