Greenfield v. Bland
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The chancellor, by his decree, refused to require specific performance sought by the appellant of the contract entered into with appellees for the sale of certain lands, and further decreed that appellees return the deposit money to the appellant. The appellant appeals, contending that specific performance should have been granted, and appellees join in the appeal contending that the deposit money should be forfeited.
The case was tried before the chancellor and the witnesses personally appeared and testified before him. Thereupon, the chancellor made the following findings upon which he based…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shouse v. DoaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
- Topper v. Alcazar Operating Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1948
- Hatchcock v. Societe Anonyme La FloridienneSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- United States Sugar Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brevard County v. ApelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Perry v. BensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Delray Beach Whitehouse Apts., Inc. v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Siegel v. GillmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Delray Beach Whitehouse Apts., Inc. v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.