Katt v. Swartz
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa; Cross, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Claus Katt against Nicholas Swartz for work and labor. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
Antecedent to the- commencement of this case, Frederick and William Hartel, doing business as Hartel Bros., commenced an action before a justice of the peace, in Ottawa county against Claus Katt, plaintiff herein. On the same day, one of said plaintiffs filed an affidavit for a writ of • garnishment against Nicholas Swartz, defendant herein, which among other things stated that said Swartz was indebted to said Katt “for his personal work and labor.” Process was issued against and personally served upon each of *53them on, December 18, 1916. Both the summons against Katt as principal defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dodge v. KieneNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- Laidlaw v. MorrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Somers v. LoseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lehaney v. New York Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
- J. T. Sinclair Co. v. I. T. Becker Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Carter v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1919