Carter v. Babcock
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien; White, J. Assumpsit by Emma Carter against Bert Babcock for money had and received. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an action in assumpsit in which the plaintiff in her declaration seeking to recover an indebtedness, of defendant, alleges that she was the assignee of one Grant Carter, who, on April 4, 1918, for a valuable consideration, sold, assigned and transferred said indebtedness to her, and that she was the owner thereof. It further alleges that on the day aforesaid the defendant was indebted to plaintiff’s said assignor in the sum of $1,000, under the usual common counts in assumpsit.
The plaintiff’s bill of particulars of her demand was as follows:
“One Grant Carter, plaintiff’s assignor, had…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Willis v. Lyman, Sears & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1858
- Wetherwax v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
- Iron Cliffs Co. v. LahaisMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Ettelsohn v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Weimeister v. ManvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weber v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Robert W. Irwin Co. v. Sterling, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1953