Legal Opinion

Vargas v. Nautilus Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 24, 1991No. 65423PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

The plaintiffs, Thomas Robert Vargas and Peoples National Bank (Bank), appeal from summary judgment granted in favor of Nautilus Insurance Company (Nautilus), Chris-Leef General Agency (Chris-Leef), and Bud Hamm Insurance & Real Estate, Inc., (Hamm). At issue is whether an insurance policy on a building and its contents was in force on the date the building and contents were destroyed by fire. Also at issue is the Bank’s status under the policy.

Vargas owned Robert’s Body Shop. The Bank had an insurable interest both in the building…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matlock ex rel. Matlock v. HollisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Fancher v. Carson-Campbell, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Johnson v. Continental Insurance Co. of New YorkTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Elmore v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Alfred E. BockhorstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Iron Horse Auto, Inc. v. Lititz Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Wunschel v. Transcontinental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  3. Premsingh v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  4. Union State Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
  5. Auto Now Acceptance Corp. v. Catawba InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API