Legal Opinion

Shankman v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 13, 2005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaVECCHIA

This is a consolidated personal injury ease involving claims by a husband and wife against multiple defendants. The posture of the appeal is influenced by the fact that the wife’s claims included a count of negligence against her husband, the driver of the vehicle in which she was injured, that was settled prior to trial.

Chief among the issues raised before us is an allegation that an illegal “quotient verdict” was rendered by the jury. In their appeal to the Appellate Division, plaintiffs Dora and Stephen Shankman contended that the jury appeared to have used a quotient method in reaching…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. City of Dothan v. HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Marks v. State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. Dixon v. PlunsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. McCormick v. KopmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of New Jersey v. Kalil GriffinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
  2. Noonan v. Miller Memorial Community Home, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 2007
  3. D'URSO v. BAMCO, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  4. DONNA ROWE, ETC. VS. BELL & GOSSETT COMPANY (L-2353-14, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  5. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API