Legal Opinion

Noonan v. Miller Memorial Community Home, Inc.

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 8, 2007No. CV-01 0510353PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHolzberg, J.

Perodeau v. Hartford, 259 Conn. 729, 750, 792 A.2d 752 (2002), establishes that negligent infliction of emotional distress in the employment context arises only where it is based on unreasonable conduct of a defendant in the termination process. The question presented in the motion to strike filed by the defendants in the present case is whether the allegations in the plaintiffs second amended complaint are sufficient to state a claim under the rule in Perodeau.

The defendants’ motion to strike is the latest installment in a long-running dispute concerning the legal adequacy of the allegations…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Morris v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Perodeau v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Larobina v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carter v. MetLife Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API