Legal Opinion

State v. Roe

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1999No. ED 59480, ED 61197PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.

Richard Roe (“Defendant”) appeals the judgment and sentence entered upon his convictions for first-degree murder and armed criminal action. In his sole point on appeal, Defendant contends the trial court plainly erred in submitting a verdict-directing instruction that allowed the jury to convict him of first-degree murder without finding the requisite intent to Mil. We reverse and remand with directions.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The facts, which we have largely borrowed from our opinion in State v. Roe, 845 S.W.2d 601 (Mo.App. E.D.1992), are as follows:

On…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. State v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. State v. CarsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. HiblerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. BradshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. MangumMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API