State v. Roe
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.
Richard Roe (“Defendant”) appeals the judgment and sentence entered upon his convictions for first-degree murder and armed criminal action. In his sole point on appeal, Defendant contends the trial court plainly erred in submitting a verdict-directing instruction that allowed the jury to convict him of first-degree murder without finding the requisite intent to Mil. We reverse and remand with directions.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The facts, which we have largely borrowed from our opinion in State v. Roe, 845 S.W.2d 601 (Mo.App. E.D.1992), are as follows:
On…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. CarsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. HiblerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. BradshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. MangumMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.