F.F. East Co. v. United Oystermen's, C., 19600
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Complainant seeks a decree declaring that a certain "closed shop" agreement entered into by it and the defendant Union be canceled as contrary to public policy and, therefore, void. It also seeks incidental relief by way of injunction.
Complainant is engaged in that part of the oyster industry in the Delaware Bay area in New Jersey which has to do with the shucking, packing and marketing of oysters, and for two successive years has signed so-called closed shop agreements with the defendant Union, in both of which the provision with reference to closed shop is:
"It is agreed that all classes of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Berry v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Brennan v. United Hatters of North America, Local No. 17Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- Cameron v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employes & Moving Picture Operators of the United States & Canada, Local Union No. 384Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Connors v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Fleckenstein Bros. v. FleckensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carroll v. L. No. 269New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Larx Co. Inc. v. NicolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946