Larx Co. Inc. v. Nicol
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion
1. In our prior opinion, filed October 11, 1946 (supra, p. 1), we directed attention to the case of Pelc v. Kulentis, 257 Ill. App. 213 (supra, pp. 10, 17), where the Illinois court upheld a contract notwithstanding one of its provisions was in unlawful restraint of trade under Illinois public policy. Many other authorities support this viewpoint. In Paramount Famous Lasky Corp. v. National Theatre Corp. (4 Cir.) 49 F.2d 64, 66, this rule was expressed as follows:
"It has been expressly held that, where agreements in restraint of trade were unlawful in part, they were enforceable as to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Central New York Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. AverillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Cameron v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage EmployesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Hall Mfg. Co. v. Western Steel & Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
- Fox Film Corp. v. Ogden Theatre Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.