Legal Opinion

James v. Helmich

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 20, 1933No. 4-2930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kikby, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellants insist that they are entitled to recover in this cause under the provisions of the statute, § 10,507, Crawford & Moses’ Digest, their names being omitted from the will, as though the testator had died intestate, and the contention must be sustained. Rowe v. Allison, 87 Ark. 206, 112 S. W. 395.

Under the statute and its construction, appellants are entitled to inherit as though the testator had died intestate, in which event each would be entitled to one-half of the estate, since one was the adopted child and the other sole and only heir at law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Rowe v. AllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Beckett v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Hill v. WadeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dean v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. McBroom v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Negovanov v. WenskoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Scroggin v. ScrogginCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API