Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment Agency
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 27, 1999No. CIV. A. 97-1558PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge.
This case requires this Court to examine and apply the appropriate legal standard to allegations of “reverse discrimination” on the basis of race and gender, brought by a white male employee who claims to have been victimized by his employer because of his “majority status.” Plaintiffs, Todd and Roseann Murphy, his wife, have filed an Amended Complaint against Defendants, Housing Authority and Urban Redevelopment Agency of the City of Atlantic City, John Glowacki, John J. McAvaddy, Jr., and John P. Whittington, alleging three counts of unlawful reverse…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mandel v. UBS/PaineWebber, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Victor v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Rogers v. Alternative Resources Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Murphy v. Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment Agency of the City of Atlantic CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Murphy v. Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.