Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment Agency

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 15, 2002No. 01-3426, 01-3572UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Todd and Roseann Murphy, represented by Clifford Van Syoc, sued the Housing Authority of Atlantic City, New Jersey, for, among other allegations, reverse race and sex discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title VII. The District Court found that Murphy failed to establish a prima facie case for any discrimination and granted summary judgment in favor of the Housing Authority. Murphy v. Housing Authority, 32 F.Supp.2d 753 (D.N.J.1999). Murphy appealed and we affirmed that decision on January 31, 2000. Murphy v. Housing Authority, 208…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re American President Lines, Inc., Marshall P. SafirCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  2. Murphy v. Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment AgencyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  3. Murphy v. Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment Agency of the City of Atlantic CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  4. Communication Workers v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Toy v. Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Pension PlanDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2007
  2. Van Syoc v. Housing Authority and Urban Redevelopment Agency of the City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of the United States · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API