Tang v. Avitable
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
Anthony G. Avitable, plaintiff (appellee), sought to recover damages from copartners Joe W. Tang, Joe Y. Wey, and Sam Dong, for the breach of a contract to sell a nightclub business. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and plaintiff was awarded $32,300 in damages. The partners perfected this appeal and raise several interesting questions of law. For convenience we shall refer to the parties by their, last names.
The trial of this case lasted some three days; the reporter’s transcript covers 588 pages and there are numerous exhibits. Our task in preparing the opinion…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kubby v. HammondArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Hamberlin v. TownsendArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Shaffer v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1912
- Posner v. New York Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Branker v. BowmanArizona Supreme Court · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. ScottArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Chu v. RonstadtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Kerley Chemical Corp. v. Producers Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Trimble Cattle Co. v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Montierth v. State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.