Legal Opinion · Dissent

Board of Commissioners v. Elmer

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 9, 1975No. 6754Published

1DissentStoulig, Judge

I respectfully dissent. We remanded this case to permit both litigants to adduce evidence on the market value of the land in 1949, the date of the Zodiac-Elmer sale. The point of inquiry was to determine whether the purchase price was so minimal that it would have caused a reasonable man to suspect the title was tainted or so insufficient as to “excite his inquiry,” thereby imposing the obligation upon the purchaser to investigate the title. The documents and testimony produced on the remand added nothing of probative value.

Plaintiff filed 33 acts of sale into evidence whereby Dr. Elmer sold…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Land Development Co. v. SchulzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  2. Smith v. Southern Kraft CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  3. Jacobs v. Southern Advance Bag & Paper CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  4. Dupuy v. JolySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  5. Nugent v. Urania Lbr. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API