Legal Opinion

Striefel v. Striefel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 2004No. 20040072PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Edward Charles Striefel appealed and Ann Kathleen Striefel cross-appealed from the judgment entered in their divorce action. We conclude that the trial court’s findings of fact about spousal support are not clearly erroneous and the trial court’s finding of fact about Edward’s CalPERS benefits is contrary to California law. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

I

[¶ 2] The parties married in 1986 while they were attending college, and are the parents of two children, who were born in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of StenquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Fox v. FoxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sommers v. SommersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Schmidt v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Amsbaugh v. AmsbaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kostelecky v. KosteleckyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Hitz v. HitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Lynnes v. LynnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Lorenz v. LorenzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API