Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Nickel
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
In the original action in the court of common pleas, the plaintiff charged specific acts of negligence upon the part of the railway company, to wit, stopping its car and permitting the plaintiff to alight at a point between regular stopping places, and failing to warn plaintiff of the approach of automobiles. The plaintiff charged the defendant Doctorvitz with separate and distinct acts of negligence, to wit, operating her automobile at an unlawful rate of speed past a standing street car without giving warning of her approach, and failing to maintain proper control of her automobile so as to…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Royan Indemnity Co. v. BeckerOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Garbe v. HalloranOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- McCrory v. Children's HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re Miamisburg Train Derailment LitigationOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Seifert v. BurroughsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.