State v. Finch
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Beier, J.:
This appeal by the State arises on a question reserved in a driving under the influence (DUI) prosecution. The State challenges the district court judge’s decision to grant a motion for judgment of acquittal based on the margin of error for the Intoxilyzer 5000 used to test defendant’s blood-alcohol concentration.
Factual and Procedural Background
Defendant Paul R. Finch was arrested for DUI, and his blood-alcohol concentration was measured at .08 through the use of an Intoxilyzer 5000 within 2 hours of his operating a vehicle. The State…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gardner v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- United States v. John Charles Richard MentzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- State v. SkolautSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. StallingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Graham v. Dokter Trucking GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BarlowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. GuderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. SnellingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- In Re the Protests of Oakhill Land Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
- Wheatland Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. PolanskyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.