Legal Opinion

State v. Finch

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 2011No. 101,136PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beier, J.:

This appeal by the State arises on a question reserved in a driving under the influence (DUI) prosecution. The State challenges the district court judge’s decision to grant a motion for judgment of acquittal based on the margin of error for the Intoxilyzer 5000 used to test defendant’s blood-alcohol concentration.

Factual and Procedural Background

Defendant Paul R. Finch was arrested for DUI, and his blood-alcohol concentration was measured at .08 through the use of an Intoxilyzer 5000 within 2 hours of his operating a vehicle. The State…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gardner v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. United States v. John Charles Richard MentzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. State v. SkolautSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  4. State v. StallingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Graham v. Dokter Trucking GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BarlowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. GuderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. SnellingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. In Re the Protests of Oakhill Land Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  5. Wheatland Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. PolanskyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API