Wheatland Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Polansky
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Leben, J.:
When Wheatland Electric Cooperative asked the Division of Water Resources to change characteristics of the company’s water rights, the Division approved the changes but limited the amount of water that Wheatland could use under the rights. The district court that reviewed the Division’s decision remanded the case to the Division to reconsider the rights’ consumptive-use hmitation, and the Division then initiated abandonment proceedings and terminated the unused portions of those rights. The district court reviewed the Division’s actions again, this time finding that the division…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hamlin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Kansas Department of Revenue v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re the Protests of Oakhill Land Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
- Romkes v. University of KansasCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
- Clawson v. State, Department of Agriculture, Division of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
- Goldman v. The University of KansasCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- In re Equalization Appeal of Kansas Star CasinoCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.