Legal Opinion

State v. Guder

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 27, 2012No. 101,632PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rosen, J.:

We have repeatedly held that the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act (KSGA), K.S.A. 21-4701 et seq., governs the jurisdiction of courts to impose sentences. This appeal asks us to address the authority of district courts to modify sentences following remand from the appellate courts. We reiterate our earlier decisions holding that, in enacting the KSGA, the legislature intended to restrict the authority of district courts to modify sentences once the sentences have been pronounced from the bench.

Rolland D. Guder, the appellant, pleaded guilty to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  2. State v. McAdamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. State v. BallardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. State v. PhinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. MurdockSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. QuestedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. Martin v. NaikSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. State v. KillingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API