Tompkins v. Harrisburg Auction House
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
By an instrument in writing, hearing date A & 1930, David Cramer, trading as 0 7 7 7 0 Harrisburg Auction House, either leased or sold store fixtures to David B. Sykes, a merchant. After a time Sykes was adjudged a bankrupt. Cramer then filed with the referee a petition of! reclamation, asserting title to ^le I)r0P6rty under the writing between himself and Sykes which purports to be a ... , rm n „ , I .... bailment. The referee found it a eondition- , . .. , ... , . al sale; the court, a bailment. The trustee _. ’. ’ ™
Evidently the instrument was dratted by a person…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Root v. Republic Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Commonwealth v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Ott v. SweatmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Stiles v. SeatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Brunswick & Balke Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Oberan v. Western MacHinery Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Commercial Inv. Trust Co. v. MinonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939