Legal Opinion

Tompkins v. Harrisburg Auction House

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 25, 1933No. 4977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

By an instrument in writing, hearing date A & 1930, David Cramer, trading as 0 7 7 7 0 Harrisburg Auction House, either leased or sold store fixtures to David B. Sykes, a merchant. After a time Sykes was adjudged a bankrupt. Cramer then filed with the referee a petition of! reclamation, asserting title to ^le I)r0P6rty under the writing between himself and Sykes which purports to be a ... , rm n „ , I .... bailment. The referee found it a eondition- , . .. , ... , . al sale; the court, a bailment. The trustee _. ’. ’ ™

Evidently the instrument was dratted by a person…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Root v. Republic Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Commonwealth v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Ott v. SweatmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Stiles v. SeatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Brunswick & Balke Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oberan v. Western MacHinery Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Commercial Inv. Trust Co. v. MinonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API