Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1926No. Appeal, 21PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Kephaet,

The levy made under section 1 of the Act of June 17, 1913, P. L. 507, imposing a tax on loans, including car trust securities, was for county purposes (Com. v. Le-high & New England Railroad Co., 268 Pa. 271); the State could not claim the tax under section 17 of the same act. This latter section was amended by the Act of July 15, 1919, P. L. 955, providing as follows: “Section 17. That all scrip, bonds, certificates and evidences of indebtedness issued......or assumed, or on which interest shall be paid, by any and every private corporation,......are hereby made…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Callery's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Lederer v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Stiles v. SeatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Murray v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Commonwealth v. Allied Building Credits, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth v. Willson Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. Repplier Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Scranton v. O'Malley Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API