Legal Opinion
Sorrells v. Cole
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 18, 1965No. 40959PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
The first issue is whether Floyd Superior Court was authorized to require Sorrells to answer the interrogatories under pain of punishment for contempt. Plaintiff proceeded under the provisions of the Depositions and Discovery Act of 1959 (Code Ch. 38-21) and particularly of § 38-2106 for the taking of Sorrells’ deposition by written interrogatories. After service on him of the interrogatories and notice to appear at a time stated before a named notary in Fulton County to make answers, he filed objections in Floyd Superior Court where the cause in which they were being taken…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DaughertyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DaughertyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Hines v. HinesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. GauseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Bigley v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Martin v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.