Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Daugherty
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
At common law no man was bound to furnish evidence to be used against himself. The privilege before trial of inspecting documents, articles, and the like in possession of an adversary was simply not accorded a litigant. These could be obtained at the time of trial by the giving of a notice to produce—the penalty for failing to produce being the admission of secondary evidence, but discovery was available only by means of a bill in equity.
In this State the equitable proceeding, itself a somewhat cumbersome thing clothed with restrictions and technicalities, has been used but…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Underwood v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Grasham v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Frazier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1975
- General Motors Corp. v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Marriott Corp. v. American Academy of Psychotherapists, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- State v. Catch the BearSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.