Legal Opinion

Roller v. Holley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

— This suit was instituted by appellant to recover a judgment against Stephen Holley and William Holley on five promissory notes, each for §228, and to foreclose a vendor’s lien on 114 acres of land. Joseph Peeples, II. W. Williams, and W. T. Jackson, appellees, were made parties defendant, under an allegation that they were asserting an interest in the land, and a foreclosure of the vendor’s lien was prayed for against them. Stephen and William Holley did not answer, but the other appellees filed an answer, alleging that appellant purchased the land from John W. and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kimmarle & Hirsh v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Maddox v. CraigTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Battle, Heck & Co. v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Hewitt v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API