Maddox v. Craig
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Clay. Tried below before Hon. P. M. Stine. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Associate Justice.
This is a writ of- error from a judgment by default rendered against the plaintiffs in error as makers of a promissory note.
It is first claimed that the judgment is erroneous because of a variance between the petition and the citations which were served upon the defendants S. S. Maddox and J. W. Maddox. In the petition the plaintiff is styled “J. T. Craig, assignee of C. W. Israel and J. ¡Ni Israel & Co.” In the citations the defendants are summoned to answer the petition of “ J. T. Craig, assignee of C. W. Israel & Co.” If the petition had read “ J. T. Craig, as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- York v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Kimmarle & Hirsh v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by22 opinions
- Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Tennant's Heirs v. FrettsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Adams v. BartellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Silver Camp Mining Co. v. DickertMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Young, Ex'r v. State Bank of MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.