Hewitt v. Thomas
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Kaufman. Tried below before the Hon. M. H. Bonner. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gould, Associate Justice.
When this case was before this court on a former appeal, (37 Tex., 520,) it was held, that the defendant had no legal notice of the amended petition, setting up the mortgage. When the case was remanded, on this and other grounds, the plaintiff, whose pleadings there*234tofore described the defendant as a resident of the county when suit was brought, made, by his attorney, an affidavit, dated April 28,1865, that “the defendant, L. W. Hewitt, is a non-resident of the State of Texas,” and thereupon citation, by publication, was issued and returned. We do not feel called…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson v. ZeiglerTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Blossman v. LetchfordTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Battle, Heck & Co. v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Davis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Goodlove v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1852
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stewart v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Mabee v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Byrnes v. SampsonTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Daniel Miller Co. v. PuettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Roller v. HolleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.