Legal Opinion

Ward v. Davis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1985No. 49291PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL R. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.

Defendants appeal the circuit court’s refusal to set aside a judgment entered after a hearing on an assigned trial date at which defendants and their attorney failed to appear.

Plaintiffs sued upon a promissory note given by defendants in consideration for the sale to defendants of an interest in a body shop. Defendants filed an answer in which they asserted no affirmative defenses. On the date set for trial plaintiffs and their counsel appeared, but no one appeared for defendants. The court clerk and bailiff attempted to contact counsel for the defendants, to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hamm v. HammMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Savings Finance Corporation v. BlairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Caldwell Paint Manufacturing Co. v. LeBeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Horobec v. MuellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Clinton v. ClintonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cotleur v. DanzigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. Vetter & Associates, Inc. v. Dimarco Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Hoey v. RoystonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Pioneer Advertising Co. v. Ringleader Restaurants, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API