Legal Opinion

Eck v. Eck

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1958No. 37,235PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Plaintiff brought an action for separate maintenance, but, upon commencement of trial, the complaint was amended to ask for a divorce and alimony. Defendant withdrew the parts of his answer which contested the grounds for divorce reserving only the question of alimony and property settlement, and the trial proceeded as by default on the issue of divorce.

Plaintiff was awarded $600 per month as permanent alimony, subject to the provision that the alimony should not, at any time, exceed 25 percent of the defendant’s gross income. Plaintiff was awarded the use of the homestead of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Spratt v. SprattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Haskell v. HaskellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Kate v. KateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Ruprecht v. RuprechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Cloutier v. CloutierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Kendall v. KendallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Husband H. v. Wife H.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API