Kendall v. Kendall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
These cross-appeals from a judgment in a divorce action raise issues that warrant little discussion.
Defendant husband contends, first, that the evidence was insufficient to justify the granting of a divorce to plaintiff wife on grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment and, further, that the court’s finding of that fact lacked requisite detail. Careful study of the record discloses substantial evidence to support a finding of serious and unjustified misconduct by defendant so plainly subversive of the marital relationship and so hopelessly inimical to the personal welfare of plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spratt v. SprattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Posselt v. PosseltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Burke v. BurkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roberson v. RobersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Lenzmeier v. LenzmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Marriage of Montgomery v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Bowman v. Brooklyn Pet HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.