Legal Opinion

Kate v. Kate

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 22, 1951No. 35,486PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

This is a proceeding brought by Blanche Kate under the provisions of M. S. A. 518.23 to revise a divorce decree so as to increase alimony due her from plaintiff, Charles B. Kate. Defendant’s petition for increased alimony came on for hearing before the district court and was, in all respects, denied. This appeal is taken upon the ground that the district court abused its discretion in issuing the order wherein defendant’s petition was denied.

The divorce decree which defendant seeks to have revised was granted February 14, 1939. Sometime prior thereto, plaintiff had…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Hempel v. HempelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Haskell v. HaskellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Dunshee v. DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Kiesow v. KiesowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Mark v. MarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Mund v. MundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API