Legal Opinion
State v. Estate of Elliott
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 2005No. 30441PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Chief Justice.
The State of Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (Department) maintains that it is entitled to establish a claim against the estate of Dolores Arlene Elliott (Elliott) pursuant to Idaho Code § 56-218 (2002). The district court affirmed a decision by the magistrate court that the Department had no cause of action under I.C. § 56-218. The Department appeals.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Elliott was born on February 21, 1937. She purchased a house in 1962 while married to Ken Berry. Elliott and Berry divorced in 1971 and Elliott was awarded the house in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Bowles v. Pro Indiviso, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Garner v. BartschiIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Electrical Wholesale Supply Co. v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- State, Dept. of Health & Welfare v. HouselIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Osburn v. RandelIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Ater v. Idaho Bureau of Occupational LicensesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Birdwood Subdivision Homeowners' Ass'n v. Bulotti Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Stafford v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Estate of KaminskyIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.