Legal Opinion

State, Dept. of Health & Welfare v. Housel

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2004No. 28652PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

The Department of Health and Welfare (“Department”) appeals from the district court’s determination that the magistrate judge had no right or power to order child support payments between parents who were married and not legally separated.

I

FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

At the time this action was initiated Richard Housel (“Richard”) and Kimberly Housel (“Kimberly”) were married and the parents of three minor children. Although the Housels were living separately, neither had filed for divorce or legal separation.

On October 1,1998, the Department filed a complaint against…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. James Hamilton, as Administrator of the Estate of Gordon Daniel Hamilton, Deceased v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Baxter v. CraneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. Mark LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Meyers v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Jim & Maryann Plane Family Trust v. SkinnerIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Hartman v. United Heritage Property & Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API