Legal Opinion

Jerome Realty Co. v. Yankovich

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas C. Chimera, J.

Defendant tenant moves pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for summary judgment and plaintiff makes a cross motion for the same relief. The action is one for a permanent injunction for damages and for attorneys’ fees. It appears to be a case of first impression.

We are asked to take a second look at the ancient feud between landlords and dogs and to say whether the drastic remedy of injunction is available against a recalcitrant tenant who, in two different paragraphs of a written lease, agreed that no dogs, cats or other animals shall be kept or harbored in the demised…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Musical Mutual Protective UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. American Lumber Co. v. Employers Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  3. L. H. Estates Co. v. BartholomewAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fanchild Investors, Inc. v. CohenCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964
  2. East River Housing Corp. v. MatonisNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hilltop Village Cooperative 4, Inc. v. GoldsteinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API