Legal Opinion

L. H. Estates Co. v. Bartholomew

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 28, 1957PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants are statutory tenants under a lease which has expired. The lease contains a provision that the tenant shall not install or use a washing machine without the ■written consent of the landlord and that a breach of this provision shall be deemed a substantial violation of the lease.

This case presents three questions: (1) Where a lease provides that a specific act is a substantial violation, can the court go behind that agreement and inquire whether it is or not? (2) If the court can, was there such a violation in this case? (3) If the specific violation does not cause any hardship but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Park East Land Corp. v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parkside Development Co. v. McGeeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
  2. Mutual ReDevelopment Houses, Inc. v. HanftCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964
  3. Fanchild Investors, Inc. v. CohenCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964
  4. Emanden Realty Corp. v. AngleyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
  5. Jerome Realty Co. v. YankovichNew York Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API