Legal Opinion

East River Housing Corp. v. Matonis

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyles J. Lane, J.

The “occupancy agreement” between plaintiff co-operative and defendant occupant provides: “No animals of any kind shall be kept or harbored in the demised premises.” (Rules and Regulations, par. 16.)

Plaintiff co-operative brings this suit in equity to enjoin defendant from continuing in possession of a small dog, alleging that it has no adequate remedy at law, and planting itself upon Knolls Co-op. Section No. II v. Cashman (N. Y. L. J., March 5, 1963, p. 17, col. 3 [per Korn, J., Sup. Ct., Bronx County], affd. 19 A D 2d 789 [1st Dept., 1963], affd. 14 N Y 2d 579 [1964]).

Defendant admits…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mutual ReDevelopment Houses, Inc. v. HanftCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964
  2. Jerome Realty Co. v. YankovichNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. East River Housing Corp. v. MatonisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Triangle Management Corp. v. InnissCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API