Legal Opinion
United States v. Fuller
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 8, 2008No. 07-30114PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-appellant Leonard Fuller was convicted of possession of an identification document that appears to be made by or under the authority of the United States which is stolen or produced without lawful authority, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(6). On this appeal, we must decide whether, in a prosecution under § 1028(a)(6), the government must prove that the identification document in question appeared to be issued by a real agency of the United States. We hold that the government does not; consequently, we affirm Fuller’s conviction.
JURISDICTION
The district…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louise Han PEREZ; Joseph Eclavea Perez; John Velasco Cruz, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. KESSI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Nancey Silvers v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Longview Fibre Co. v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. JaenschCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. BlixtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Other MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. GallaherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Christopher SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.