Legal Opinion
United States v. Blixt
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 26, 2008No. 07-30198PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Margaret Blixt (Blixt) appeals from her jury conviction and sentence for mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and aggravated identity theft under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A. The district court denied Blixt’s motion to dismiss the aggravated identity theft charge and subsequent motion for acquittal on the same count. The court determined as a matter of law that contrary to Blixt’s assertion, a signature is a name for the purpose of defining a “means of identification” as used in § 1028A. The district court also denied Blixt’s motion for acquittal on the mail fraud charge,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ali v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Zameer Nooralla Mohamed, AKA Al, AKA Samier Hussain, AKA Zameer MohamedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- LVRC HOLDINGS LCC v. BrekkaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Freddie WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. AliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Nicholas LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.