UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louise Han PEREZ; Joseph Eclavea Perez; John Velasco Cruz, Defendants-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Concurrence by Judge KLEINFELD.
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
The issue we resolve today is the viability of this circuit’s “invited error” doctrine following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 118 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). The three-judge panel (“panel”) suggested that Olano overruled that doctrine, at least in the context of jury instructions specifically requested by the defendant. United States v. Perez, 67 F.3d 1371, 1385 n. 13 (9th Cir.1995). On en banc review, we conclude that Olano limits our application of the invited…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by295 opinions
- Cion Peralta v. T. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Douglas LACY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Pablo Bastidas v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Stuart RommCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
290 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.