Legal Opinion

White v. Simard

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 5, 2003No. 1152, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

In this case of first impression, we are asked to decide whether parties to a power of sale foreclosure may “contract out” of the common law rule that the defaulting purchaser is entitled to any surplus proceeds of resale. Elizabeth A. White, Nancy P. Regelin, and Patrick M. Martyn, Substitute Trustees (“Trustees”), and Washington Mutual Bank, FA, successor to Home Savings of America, F.S.B. (“Lender”), appellants/cross-appellees, challenge the decision of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County sustaining the exceptions of David J. Simard, appellee/cross-appellant, to an Auditor’s…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Winterstein v. WilcomCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. Wolf v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Hanover Fire Insurance v. Alexander Brown & SonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Simard v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Baltrotsky v. KuglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Heartwood 88, Inc. v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Joseph Antonio v. SSA Security, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  5. 101 Geneva LLC v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API