Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 18, 1994No. 104, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

In this case we focus upon the enforceability of an exculpatory clause in an agreement between an investor and a securities investment firm. The clause at issue provides that the investment firm will not be liable for losses to the investor resulting from the firm’s negligence, but only for those losses resulting from its gross negligence or wilful misconduct. Under the circumstances of the instant case, we shall enforce the exculpatory clause. Viewing the evidence and all inferences therefrom in a light most favorable to Elizabeth Wolf, the appellant, the following facts were…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Blankenheim v. E. F. Hutton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Winterstein v. WilcomCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker ClinicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. 100 Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Columbia Town Center Title Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Tayar v. Camelback Ski Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Dalury v. S-K-I, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API